Benedict v. Indeed Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Lance M Benedict
Defendant: Indeed Corporation and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2023cv02291
Filed: November 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles
Referring Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2023 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Indeed Corporation. (Schmidt, Cindy)
November 15, 2023 Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Lance M Benedict. (WLP)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - Both counsel and pro se litigants must abide by the Local Rules of Civil Procedure ("LRCiv" or "Local Rules"), Rules of Practice of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court will schedule a case management conference in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure once Defendant(s) have been served or have appeared in the action. Any motion made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 is discouraged if the challenged defect in the pleading can be cured by filing an amended pleading. See Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 11/13/23. (SMF)
November 10, 2023 Filing 9 *MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) by Indeed Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of C Garci, #2 Exhibit Benedict v Google, #3 Exhibit Benedict v Simms) (Schmidt, Cindy) *Modified to correct event/ add motion on 11/13/2023 (DXD).
November 9, 2023 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Diane J Humetewa. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-23-2291-PHX-DJH. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
November 8, 2023 Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
November 3, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (JAM)
November 3, 2023 Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22454175. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Camille D Bibles. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-2291-PHX-CDB. Magistrate Election form attached.PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (JAM)
November 3, 2023 Filing 3 Verification in Support of #1 Notice of Removal. (Schmidt, Cindy) (JAM)
November 3, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Indeed Corporation. (Schmidt, Cindy) (JAM)
November 3, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-011544. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22454175 filed by Indeed Corporation. (Schmidt, Cindy) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(JAM)
November 3, 2023 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Proof of Service re: Summons, Complaint upon Indeed Corporation on 10/5/23. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 10/5/23.) (JAM) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benedict v. Indeed Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lance M Benedict
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indeed Corporation
Represented By: Cindy Kay Schmidt
Represented By: Corey B Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?