Ventura v. Avondale, City of
| Christopher Ventura |
| Avondale, City of |
| 2:2023cv02328 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 2/29/2024 at 09:30 AM before Judge Douglas L Rayes. See attached document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 12/19/2023. (RMV)
|
| Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Avondale, City of.(Biddle, Steven) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the parties' #7 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, the deadline for Defendant City of Avondale to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to and including 12/18/2023. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 11/30/2023. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by Avondale, City of. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Biddle, Steven) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Christopher Ventura: Certificate of Service re: Complaint upon City of Avondale on 11/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Enger, Eli) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Motions to dismiss, motions for judgment, and motions to strike are discouraged if the perceived defect(s) can be cured in any part by filing an amended pleading. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant and file notice of service with the Court. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 11/7/2023. (KJ)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Avondale, City of. (BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22461340. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-02328-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Christopher Ventura. (Enger, Eli) (BAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22461340 filed by Christopher Ventura. (Enger, Eli) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ventura v. Avondale, City of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Ventura | |
| Represented By: | Eli Enger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Avondale, City of | |
| Represented By: | Steven Gregory Biddle |
| Represented By: | Sarah Nicole O'Keefe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
