Padilla et al v. Veyo LLC et al
| Marina Padilla, Nicole Brooke Amparan and Diana J Parrot |
| Veyo LLC, Medical Transportation Management Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2023cv02380 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER by Nicole Brooke Amparan, Marina Padilla, Diana J Parrot. (Attachments: #1 Instructions)(Rebholz, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 13
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Nicole Brooke Amparan, Marina Padilla, Diana J Parrot. (Rebholz, Jennifer)
|
|
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Janine Prupas on behalf of Defendants Medical Transportation Management Incorporated, Veyo LLC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: On review, the parties' stipulation for entry of a protective order (Doc. #11 ) is DENIED without prejudice because paragraph 8 of the proposed protective order appears to pre-authorize the filing of confidential-designated material under seal, subject only to compliance with the Court's e-filing protocols. The Court will not approve a protective order that pre-authorizes the filing of documents under seal. Before filing anything under seal, the party asserting confidentiality must file a motion to seal and make the requisite showing of compelling reasons or good cause, depending on the nature of the filing. To that end, LRCiv 5.6(d) explains the default procedure to be followed when a party seeks to file with the Court material designated as confidential by another party. The parties' stipulation therefore is denied without prejudice to them submitting a new protective order that comports with LRCiv 5.6(d) or provides for a comparable procedure. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/9/2024. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 11
STIPULATION for Entry of Protective Order by Nicole Brooke Amparan, Marina Padilla, Diana J Parrot. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Protective Order)(Rebholz, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Nicole Brooke Amparan, Marina Padilla, Diana J Parrot. (Rebholz, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Medical Transportation Management Incorporated, Veyo LLC. (Rinner, Todd)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jennifer Rebholz appearing for Nicole Brooke Amparan, Marina Padilla, Diana J Parrot. . (Rebholz, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Scheduling Conference is set for January 18, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. (Arizona time). The Court anticipates this hearing to be held telephonically. The parties will be provided with call-in information via separate email. In preparation for this Scheduling Conference, it is hereby Ordered as follows: The parties are ordered to provide initial disclosures at least 21 calendar days before the Scheduling Conference in the form required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1). If a party has been served, but has not appeared, plaintiff or counter-claimant shall give notice of this order to that party. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 11/21/2023. (KLG)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, with Jury Demand Defendants Veyo, LLC and Medical Transportation Management, Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint by Medical Transportation Management Incorporated, Veyo LLC.(Rinner, Todd)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 11/14/2023. (RMV)
|
|
Filing 4
Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22481550. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-2380-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM)
|
|
Filing 3
VERIFICATION OF REMOVAL FILINGS by Medical Transportation Management Incorporated, Veyo LLC re: #1 Notice of Removal. (Rinner, Todd) (JAM)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Medical Transportation Management Incorporated, Veyo LLC. (Rinner, Todd) (JAM)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-095086. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22481550 filed by Veyo LLC, Medical Transportation Management Incorporated. (Rinner, Todd) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(JAM)
|
|
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, Civil Cover Sheet upon Veyo LLC on 10/23/23. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 10/24/23.) SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, Civil Cover Sheet upon Medical Transportation Management Inc on 10/25/23. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 10/27/23.) (JAM) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
