Hyder v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
Charles Hyder |
Safeco Insurance Company of America and Unknown Parties |
2:2023cv02407 |
November 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Dominic W Lanza |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal - Breach of Contract - Insurance |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER - The parties have submitted a stipulation to stay the litigation pending early mediation. (Doc. #11 .) Rather than formally staying the litigation, the Court will extend the deadline to submit the Rule 26(f) report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (Doc. #11 ) is granted to the extent that the only pending deadline in this casethe deadline for the parties to file a joint Rule 26(f) reportis extended to March 15, 2024. The case remains active. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/5/24. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION to Stay Litigation by Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pepe, Micalann) |
Filing 10 ORDER REQUIRING RULE 26(f) REPORT - The parties are directed to meet, confer, and develop a Rule 26(f) Joint Case Management Report, which must be filed no later than January 4, 2024. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 12/7/2023. (SLQ) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Safeco Insurance Company of America.(Pepe, Micalann) |
Filing 8 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (Doc. #7 ) is granted. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to December 6, 2023. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 11/22/2023. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline)(Pepe, Micalann) |
Filing 6 PRELIMINARY ORDER - (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 11/20/2023. (SLQ) |
Filing 5 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Charles Hyder. (Dieker, Douglas) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Party Fictitious by Charles Hyder. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dieker, Douglas) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22490833. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-2407-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Pepe, Micalann) (MYE) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-015992. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22490833 filed by Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Pepe, Micalann) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MYE) |
***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Return of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Safeco Insurance Company of America on 10/16/2023. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 10/30/2023.) (MYE) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.