Whitehead v. Grand Canyon University et al
David Whitehead |
Grand Canyon University, Araxi Hovhannessian and Unknown Parties |
2:2023cv02497 |
December 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Personal Injury: Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Defendants by David Whitehead. (3 Pages) (KLG) |
Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Grand Canyon University, Araxi Hovhannessian, Unknown Parties filed by David Whitehead. (13 Pages)(KLG) |
|
|
Filing 6 Filing fee PAID IN FULL. (BAS) |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (CSL) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-2497-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (CSL) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by David Whitehead. (CSL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by David Whitehead. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CSL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.