Montes-Chavez v. Heisner et al
Jason Trinidad Montes-Chavez |
RA Heisner, B Birkholz and Unknown Parties |
2:2023cv02523 |
December 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Eileen S Willett (PS) |
Steven P Logan |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed January 10, 2024, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed. (EJA) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Clerk of Court must update Petitioner's address of record. Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. #1 ) and this case are dismissed. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #2 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. See document for details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/9/24. (EJA) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jason Trinidad Montes-Chavez. Reason for return: attempted not known; return to sender. Document number #3 . (EJA) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SMF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Jason Trinidad Montes-Chavez. (9 Pages) (SMF) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Jason Trinidad Montes-Chavez. (9 Pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SMF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.