Ramos v. Elite Rooter Phoenix Incorporated et al
| Julio Ermes Hernandez Ramos |
| Elite Rooter Phoenix Incorporated, Pratik Patel and Unknown Patel |
| 2:2023cv02531 |
| December 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Elite Rooter Phoenix Incorporated, Pratik Patel, Unknown Patel. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22553353. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Roslyn O Silver. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-02531-PHX-ROS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Elite Rooter Phoenix Incorporated, Pratik Patel, Unknown Patel. (submitted by Clifford Bendau) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22553353 filed by Julio Ermes Hernandez Ramos. (submitted by Clifford Bendau) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
