Montanez #360986 v. Unknown Party et al
Petitioner: Manuel R Montanez
Respondent: Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2023cv02653
Filed: December 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle (PS)
Referring Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2024 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE by Manuel R Montanez. (2 pages) (EJA)
January 11, 2024 Filing 5 Filing fee PAID IN FULL. (BAS)
January 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must file a completed and signed Certificate, using the Certificate form provided with this Order, certifying that Petitioner's signature on the Certificate will serve as an original signature, under penalty of perjury, on his 2254 Petition for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 2242, Rule 2(c)(5) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 3.5(a) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If Petitioner fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, strike Petitioner's 2254 Petition and enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner a Certificate form and a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/4/24. (Attachments: #1 IFP)(EJA)
December 18, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (EJA)
December 18, 2023 Filing 2 *NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (EJA) *Modified on 12/19/2023 - NEF regenerated to Petitioner only (RMW).
December 18, 2023 Filing 1 *PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Manuel R Montanez. (23 pages and envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(EJA) *Modified on 12/19/2023 - NEF regenerated to Petitioner only (RMW).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montanez #360986 v. Unknown Party et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Manuel R Montanez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?