Al-Taee v. Gaudiosi et al
Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee |
Eric Gaudiosi and Antony Blinken |
2:2023cv02685 |
December 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Douglas L Rayes |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee: Notice of Service re: Judge Order upon Defendant(s). (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee: Return of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Gary M. Restaino on 01/03/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee: Return of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Merrick Garland on 01/08/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee: Return of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Eric Gaudiosi on 01/08/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee: Return of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Antony Blinken on 01/08/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 7 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/2/2024. (RMV) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BAS) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Eric Gaudiosi. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Joshua L Goldstein on behalf of Plaintiff Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee. (Goldman, Maurice) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Writ of Mandamus filed by Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(1) - The name, address, e-mail address, State Bar Attorney number, telephone number, and optionally the fax number, of the attorney appearing for the party in the action or proceeding and whether the attorney appears for the plaintiff, defendant, or other party - in propria persona - must be typewritten or printed in the space to the left of the center of the page and beginning at line one (1) on the first page. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22600733. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-02685-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT OF MANDAMUS and COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22600733 filed by Hawraa Fakher Al-Taee. (submitted by Maurice Goldman) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.