Heiserman v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
| David Allen Heiserman |
| USAA Casualty Insurance Company and Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 2:2024cv00041 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Meyer, Nathan) |
| Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by David Allen Heiserman. (Rubinov, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by David Allen Heiserman. (Rubinov, Daniel) |
Filing 9
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the parties' #8 Stipulation to Extend Initial Disclosure Deadline, the deadline for the parties to simultaneously submit their initial disclosure statements is extended to and including 2/29/2024. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/21/24. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION to Extend IDS Deadline by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Meyer, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan David Meyer on behalf of Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Meyer, Nathan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 3/14/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Douglas L Rayes. See attached document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/16/2024. (RMV)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company.(Meyer, Nathan) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/8/2024. (RMV)
|
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22632076. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00041-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (submitted by Nathan Meyer) (REK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-018912. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22632076 filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (submitted by Nathan Meyer) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
| ***State Court record received on 1/05/2024***SERVICE EXECUTED filed by David Allen Heiserman: Notice of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company on 12/11/2023.***Notice of Service of Process docketed in U.S. District Court on 1/05/2024 for case management purposes.*** (REK) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
