Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Delfina Morales
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2024cv00049
Filed: January 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Oscar Gonzalez de Llano appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar)
January 16, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff's #3 application to proceed without prepaying fees and costs is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to notify the Commissioner of the commencement of this action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the appropriate office within the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and to the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Opening Brief due within 30 days after the answer is filed; Commissioner's Brief due within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief; Reply Brief due within 14 days after service of Defendant's brief. See attached order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 1/12/2024. (ESG)
January 8, 2024 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00049-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK)
January 8, 2024 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Delfina Morales. (submitted by Kathryn Dicus) (REK)
January 8, 2024 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Delfina Morales. (submitted by Kathryn Dicus) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK)
January 8, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Delfina Morales. (submitted by Kathryn Dicus) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delfina Morales
Represented By: Kathryn Dicus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Oscar Gonzalez de Llano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?