Doane v. Conversion Kings LLC et al
| Robert A Doane |
| Conversion Kings LLC, Michael W Muhlethaler and Francis J Wood, IV |
| 2:2024cv00130 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Robert A Doane. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Richard B Reiling on behalf of Plaintiff Robert A Doane. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number BAZDC-22670081. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00130-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number BAZDC-22670081 filed by Robert A Doane. (submitted by Richard Reiling) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
