Jenkins v. Western Alliance Bank et al
John Jenkins |
Western Alliance Bank and Western Alliance Bancorporation |
2:2024cv00152 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
James A Teilborg |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case and MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Western Alliance Bancorporation, Western Alliance Bank. (Coulter, John) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case and MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by John Jenkins. (Voyles, Michael) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case and, MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Western Alliance Bancorporation, Western Alliance Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Mark Azar)(Coulter, John) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Amended Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall respond to the complaint by 2/12/2024. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/1/24. (DXD) |
Filing 7 AMENDED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond to Complaint by Western Alliance Bancorporation, Western Alliance Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Coulter, John) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond to Complaint by Western Alliance Bancorporation, Western Alliance Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Coulter, John) |
Filing 5 STANDARD CIVIL TRACK INITIAL ORDER: This action is designated a STANDARD TRACK case. See Order for further details. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 1/23/2024. (KMB) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Western Alliance Bancorporation, Western Alliance Bank. (Coulter, John) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Western Alliance Bancorporation, Western Alliance Bank. (REK) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22680477. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A. Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00152-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-096321. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22680477 filed by Western Alliance Bancorporation, Western Alliance Bank. (submitted by John Coulter) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C, #2 Exhibit D, #3 Exhibit E-I, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
***State Court record received on 1/22/2024***SERVICE EXECUTED filed by John Jenkins: Declaration of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Western Alliance Bank and Western Alliance Bancorporation on 1/05/2024.***Declarations of Service filed in State Court on 1/10/2024, docketed in U.S. District Court on 1/22/2024 for case management purposes.*** (REK) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.