Love v. United States of America
| Nathaniel Richard Love |
| United States of America a governmental entity doing business as United States Postal Service |
| 2:2024cv00231 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine |
| Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Nathaniel Richard Love: Proof of Service re: Summons & Complaint upon US Attorney, District of Arizona Civil Process Clerk & US Attorney General on 2/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified RR Civil Process Clerk, #2 Exhibit Certified RR US Atty General)(Hester, Henry) *Modified to add parties and dates served on 3/7/2024 (KJ). |
| Filing 8 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Nathaniel Richard Love: Proof of Service re: Complaint, Summons & Consent to Magistrate Judge upon Defendant USA on 02/12/2024. (Hester, Henry) *Modified to remove "service unexecuted" event and text on 2/22/2024 (CSL). |
| Filing 7 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Nathaniel Richard Love. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States of America. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22718767. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00231-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Nathaniel Richard Love. (submitted by Henry Hester) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22718767 filed by Nathaniel Richard Love. (submitted by Henry Hester) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Love v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nathaniel Richard Love | |
| Represented By: | Henry G Hester |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America a governmental entity doing business as United States Postal Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
