Larry v. Scottsdale, City of et al
Plaintiff: Alexjandro Omar Larry
Defendant: Scottsdale, City of and Rian Boesen
Case Number: 2:2024cv00240
Filed: February 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles (PS)
Referring Judge: Camille D Bibles
2 Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Rian Boesen, Scottsdale, City of. (Heizer, Stephanie)
March 22, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Alexjandro Omar Larry. (Tate, Elizabeth)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Discovery due by 1/20/2025. Dispositive motions due by 2/28/2025. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 3/19/24. (KLG)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER that the telephonic scheduling conference set for Friday, March 29, 2024, at 1:30 p.m., is vacated. A scheduling order will follow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 3/19/2024. (KLG)
March 18, 2024 Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Alexjandro Omar Larry. (Tate, Elizabeth)
March 5, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Service re: #7 Order by Alexjandro Omar Larry re: #7 Order,,,, Set/Reset Hearings,,, Order on Service. (Tate, Elizabeth) *Modified to correct text on 3/5/2024 (KLG).
March 4, 2024 Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Alexjandro Omar Larry: Return of Service re: complaint, summons upon Rian Boesen on 03/04/24. (Tate, Elizabeth)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Defendant City of Scottsdale has answered the Complaint #6 . Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a telephonic scheduling conference is set for Friday, March 29, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. Counsel for the parties shall participate in the scheduling conference telephonically. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least twenty-one (21) days before the conference, in accordance with Rule 26(f), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties shall file with the court not less than seven (7) days before the scheduling conference, a joint report reflecting the results of their meeting and outlining the discovery plan. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 3/1/2024. (KLG)
March 1, 2024 Filing 6 Defendant City of Scottsdale's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Scottsdale, City of.(Heizer, Stephanie)
February 8, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rian Boesen, Scottsdale, City of. (KLG). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). This matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If properly completed, the Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses filed at Doc. #2 . Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 2/8/24. (KLG)
February 2, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK)
February 2, 2024 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Alexjandro Omar Larry. (submitted by Elizabeth Tate) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REK)
February 2, 2024 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number BAZDC-22721129 filed by Alexjandro Omar Larry. (submitted by Elizabeth Tate) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larry v. Scottsdale, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexjandro Omar Larry
Represented By: Elizabeth Diane Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scottsdale, City of
Represented By: Stephanie Lynn Heizer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rian Boesen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?