Lewis v. Otis Elevator Company et al
| Adrienne Lewis |
| Otis Elevator Company, Otis Elevator Companys Service LLC, Intel Corporation and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2024cv00304 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Jill J Ormond. (Ormond, Jill) |
Filing 13
Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, IT IS ORDERED the Rule 16 Case Management Conference, presently set for April 23, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET for April 24, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 604, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver. Ordered by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver. (RMC)( This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: The Stipulation to Continue Rule 16 Case Management Conference and Deadline to File Joint Report and Proposed Scheduling Order (Doc. #11 ) is GRANTED. The Joint Case Management Report and Proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order are now due not later than 4/16/2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Rule 16 Case Management Conference currently scheduled on 3/22/2024, at 10:00 a.m., is VACATED AND RESET for 4/23/2024, at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/15/2024. (KJ)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Continue Rule 16 Case Management Conference and Deadline to File Joint Report and Proposed Scheduling Order by Otis Elevator Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order to Continue Rule 16 CMC and Deadline to File Joint Report)(Benke, Joseph) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE for 3/22/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 604, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver. See attached document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 2/21/2024. (RMV)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Otis Elevator Company. (Barrett, Kira) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 2/21/2024. (RMV)
|
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Roslyn O Silver. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-24-00304-PHX-ROS. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 6 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Intel Corporation. (Tate, J) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Intel Corporation, Otis Elevator Company. (DXD) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22751518. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00304-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached.PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (DXD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-095638. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22751518 filed by Otis Elevator Company. (Benke, Joseph) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Record) (DXD) |
| **State Court record received on 2/13/24** SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Adrienne Lewis: Declaration of Service re: Summons, Complaint upon Otise Elevator Company, Intel Corporation on 12/13/23. Declaration of Service re: Summons, Complaint upon Otise Elevator Companys Service LLC on 12/12/23. **Filed in State Court on 12/19/23 and docketed in US District Court on 2/13/24 for case management purposes.** (DXD) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| **State Court record received on 2/13/24** ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by Intel Corporation. **Filed in State Court on 1/16/24 and docketed in US District Court on 2/13/24 for case management purposes.**(DXD) |
| **State Court record received on 2/13/24** ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by Otis Elevator Company. **Filed in State Court on 1/18/24 and docketed in US District Court on 2/13/24 for case management purposes.** (DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
