Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Natosha Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2024cv00340
Filed: February 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2024 Filing 13 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #11 Additional Attachments to Main Document,, #10 Notice of Filing - Soc. Sec. Admin. Transcript, #12 Additional Attachments to Main Document,, by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Medical Records Part 23, #2 Medical Records Part 24, #3 Medical Records Part 25, #4 Medical Records Part 26)(Martin, Justin)
April 17, 2024 Filing 12 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #11 Additional Attachments to Main Document,, #10 Notice of Filing - Soc. Sec. Admin. Transcript, by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Medical Records Part 12, #2 Medical Records Part 13, #3 Medical Records Part 14, #4 Medical Records Part 15, #5 Medical Records Part 16, #6 Medical Records Part 17, #7 Medical Records Part 18, #8 Medical Records Part 19, #9 Medical Records Part 20, #10 Medical Records Part 21)(Martin, Justin)
April 17, 2024 Filing 11 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #10 Notice of Filing - Soc. Sec. Admin. Transcript, by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Medical Records Part 1, #2 Medical Records Part 2, #3 Medical Records Part 3, #4 Medical Records Part 4, #5 Medical Records Part 5, #6 Medical Records Part 6, #7 Medical Records Part 7, #8 Medical Records Part 8, #9 Medical Records Part 9, #10 Medical Records Part 10)(Martin, Justin)
April 17, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Certified Copy of Administrative Transcript filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Transcript Index, #3 Admin Process, #4 Payment, #5 Jurisdictional Part 1, #6 Jurisdictional Part 2, #7 Jurisdictional Part 3, #8 Jurisdictional Part 4, #9 Jurisdictional Part 5, #10 Non Disability)(Martin, Justin)
February 22, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Justin L. Martin appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Martin, Justin)
February 20, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KLG)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Within thirty (30) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief addressing why the Commissioner's decision is not supported by substantial evidence or why the decision should otherwise be reversed or the case remanded. Defendant must file an answering brief within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fourteen (14) days after service of Defendant's brief. See document for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 2/20/24. (KLG)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting Plaintiff's Application #2 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to issue Notice re Social Security Case Service notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 2/20/24. (KLG)
February 19, 2024 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00340-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK)
February 19, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Natosha Smith. (submitted by Kathryn Dicus) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK)
February 19, 2024 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Natosha Smith. (submitted by Kathryn Dicus) (REK)
February 19, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Natosha Smith. (submitted by Kathryn Dicus) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natosha Smith
Represented By: Kathryn Dicus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Justin Lane Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?