Horton #092674 v. Thornell et al
| Dwayne Thomas Horton |
| Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2024cv00392 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed April 23, 2024, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 4
ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #1 ) is denied, and this action is dismissed without prejudice; the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 4/23/24. (DXD)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (DXD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Dwayne Thomas Horton (2 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
