DKB Incorporated v. Kinetic Systems Incorporated
| DKB Incorporated |
| Kinetic Systems Incorporated |
| 2:2024cv00424 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: 5 Notice of Deficiency (Text Only),, Automated Civil Cover Sheet by Defendant Kinetic Systems Incorporated. (Smiley, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Kinetic Systems Incorporated. Required documents are not attached. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file Automated Civil Cover Sheet and a Supplemental Cover Sheet. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please submit both the Automated Civil Cover Sheet and the Supplemental Cover Sheet using the following: Civil, Other Filings, Other Documents, Additional Attachment to Main Document and link to the Notice of Removal. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to DKB Incorporated. (REK) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number BAZDC-22800644. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Roslyn O Silver. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00424-PHX-ROS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kinetic Systems Incorporated. (submitted by David Smiley) (REK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2024-002534. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number BAZDC-22800644 filed by Kinetic Systems Incorporated. (submitted by David Smiley) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DKB Incorporated v. Kinetic Systems Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DKB Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Jacobsohn |
| Represented By: | Robert F Roos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kinetic Systems Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | David William Smiley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
