Chamer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
| Calvin Chamer |
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
| 2:2024cv00444 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: If Defendant files a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c) and if Plaintiff contends any further amendment of Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. #1 ) can cure any alleged deficiency, Plaintiff must submit, no later than the time Plaintiff files a response to a motion to dismiss, a proposed amended complaint containing all further allegations Plaintiff could make. In the event a motion to dismiss is granted in any part, no leave will be granted to amend the complaint beyond what is offered in that proposed amended complaint. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant and file notice of service. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/4/2024. (KJ)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on 6/4/2024. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/4/2024. (KJ)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Calvin Chamer. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please submit the Automated Civil Cover Sheet using the following: Civil, Other Filings, Other Documents, Additional Attachment to Main Document and link to the Complaint. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22807034. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00444-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22807034 filed by Calvin Chamer. (submitted by John Tucker) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chamer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Calvin Chamer | |
| Represented By: | John V Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
