Crump v. I.C. Systems Incorporated et al
| Darrell Crump |
| I.C. Systems Incorporated, Experian Information Solutions Incorporated and TransUnion LLC |
| 2:2024cv00464 |
| March 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions Incorporated, I.C. Systems Incorporated, TransUnion LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22815323. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00464-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Darrell Crump. (submitted by Michael Adams) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22815323 filed by Darrell Crump. (submitted by Michael Adams) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
