Evans v. Grand Canyon Education Incorporated et al
| Meredith Evans |
| Grand Canyon Education Incorporated and Unknown Party |
| 2:2024cv00553 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Grand Canyon Education Incorporated. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Anthony Paronich on behalf of Plaintiff Meredith Evans. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22850160. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James F Metcalf. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00553-PHX-JFM. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Meredith Evans. (submitted by Anthony Paronich) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22850160 filed by Meredith Evans. (submitted by Anthony Paronich) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
