Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Ingram v. N-Drip Incorporated et al

Ingram v. N-Drip Incorporated et al

Plaintiff:	Berenice Ingram
Defendant:	N-Drip Incorporated, Eran Pollack and Gil Lanir
Case Number:	2:2024cv00560
Filed:	March 15, 2024
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge:	Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
April 23, 2024	Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Berenice Ingram: Affidavit of Service re: Summons; Complaint; Notice of Magistrate Availability; Order upon N-Drip Inc. on 4/11/24. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Proof of Service)(Hernandez, Isaac)
April 9, 2024	Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
April 8, 2024	Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Berenice Ingram. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Hernandez, Isaac)
March 22, 2024	Filing 3 PRELIMINARY ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on June 14, 2024, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/22/2024. (SLQ)
March 15, 2024	Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22851382. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00560-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK)
March 15, 2024	Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22851382 filed by Berenice Ingram. (submitted by Isaac Hernandez) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingram v. N-Drip Incorporated et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Berenice Ingram
Represented By:	Isaac Pasaret Hernandez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: N-Drip Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Eran Pollack
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gil Lanir
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?