Thompson v. Getter et al
Tammy Thompson |
Dennis Getter, Unknown Getter, Getter Done Transport LLC, Walmart Incorporated, Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated, Unknown Parties, Virginia Getter, Titus Transport Holdings LLC and Judy Getter |
2:2024cv00732 |
April 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Dennis Getter, Judy Getter. (Young, Hunter) |
Filing 19 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Tammy Thompson: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 4/18/2024 to Titus Transport Holdings, LLC . (Henry, Jonathan) |
Filing 18 Defendants ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint Second by Dennis Getter, Judy Getter.(Young, Hunter) |
Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Titus Transport Holdings LLC. (Cook, Tamara) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Tammy Thompson . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint with Tracked Edits)(Henry, Jonathan) |
Filing 15 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an SAC by April 22, 2024, showing how it is different from the FAC pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if no additional SAC is filed by April 22, 2024, the Court will consider the First Amended Complaint in Doc. #1 to be the operative Complaint and the Answer filed by Defendants Dennis Getter and Virginia Getter (Doc. #9 ) as the operative response. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/17/2024. (JAMA) |
Filing 14 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Tammy Thompson: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 4/09/2024 to Judy Getter via counsel Hunter Young, Esq. (Henry, Jonathan) |
Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Tammy Thompson: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 4/09/2024 to Dennis Getter via counsel Hunter Young, Esq. (Henry, Jonathan) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #11 Second Amended Complaint. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 15.1(b) - The amending party must file a separate notice of filing the amended pleading. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please use event Notice of Filing - Amended Pleading (LRCiv 15.1(b)) and attach a copy of the amended pleading that indicates in what respect it differs from the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text that was deleted and underlining the text that was added. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DXD) |
Filing 11 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Tammy Thompson.(Henry, Jonathan) *Modified text on 4/10/2024 (DXD). |
Filing 10 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Dennis Getter, Virginia Getter. (Young, Hunter) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint 1st Amended by Dennis Getter, Virginia Getter.(Young, Hunter) |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Tammy Thompson: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 3/21/2024 to Dennis Getter via counsel Hunter Young, Esq. (Henry, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Tammy Thompson: Certificate of Service re: Complaint, Summons Affidavit of Service upon Titus Transport Holdings LLC on 3/05/2024. (Henry, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.12(b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defectthat would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/5/2024. (JAMA) |
Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on July 2, 2024. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/5/2024. (JAMA) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Titus Transport Holdings LLC. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Titus Transport Holdings LLC. (REK) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22903968. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00732-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-019047. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22903968 filed by Titus Transport Holdings LLC. (submitted by Tamara Cook) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.