Brown v. Unknown Party et al
| Dominique Brown |
| Unknown Party and Unknown Purdy |
| 2:2024cv00735 |
| April 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Alison S Bachus (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Unknown Purdy, Unknown Party. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please submit the Automated Civil Cover Sheet using the following: Civil, Other Filings, Other Documents, Additional Attachment to Main Document and link to the Notice of Removal. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2024-003954. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number CAZDC-22902729 filed by Unknown Purdy, Unknown Party. (submitted by Anna Critz) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
