TalentLogistiX LLC v. MC2 Contractors LLC
| TalentLogistiX LLC |
| MC2 Contractors LLC |
| 2:2024cv00795 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by TalentLogistiX LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Second summons for MC2)(Canon, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint (Civil Cover Sheet) by Plaintiff TalentLogistiX LLC. (Canon, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by TalentLogistiX LLC. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please submit the Automated Civil Cover Sheet using the following: Civil, Other Filings, Other Documents, Additional Attachment to Main Document and link to the Complaint. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #3 Summons Submitted. There are two separate parties to be served on the same form. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please submit separate Summons forms for each party to be served using the following: Civil, Amended Pleadings and Service, Service of Process, Summons Submitted. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22929445. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00795-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by TalentLogistiX LLC. (submitted by Daniel Canon) (REK) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TalentLogistiX LLC. (submitted by Daniel Canon) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22929445 filed by TalentLogistiX LLC. (submitted by Daniel Canon) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Daniel J Canon on behalf of Plaintiff TalentLogistiX LLC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TalentLogistiX LLC v. MC2 Contractors LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TalentLogistiX LLC | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J Canon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MC2 Contractors LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
