Koprucu v. Menduyk et al
Kurt Koprucu |
Ninell Menduyk and Unknown Parties |
2:2024cv00840 |
April 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Dominic W Lanza |
Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Ninell Menduyk. (Butts, Megan) |
Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Megan Rene Julian Butts. Reason for return: Return to Sender - Attempted - Not Known - Unable to Forward. Document numbers 11 , #12 . (KLG) |
Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - Discovery due by 2/28/2025. Dispositive motions due by 8/30/2025. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/22/24. (SLQ) |
Filing 11 ORDER - The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint Rule 26(f) report (Doc. #10 ), concludes it is unnecessary to hold a Rule 16 Case Management Conference. The Court will separately issue the Case Management Order. Counsel are to note at Item 12 of the Case Management Order that the deadlines are real, and the Court will enforce the deadlines set forth in the Order. The parties should plan their litigation activities accordingly. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/22/24. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Kurt Koprucu. (Klink, David) |
Filing 9 ORDER REQUIRING RULE 26(f) REPORT - The parties are directed to meet, confer, and develop a Rule 26(f) Joint Case Management Report, which must be filed no later than May 23, 2024. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/25/24. (SLQ) |
Filing 8 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Kurt Koprucu: Declaration of Service re: Summons, Complaint upon Ninell Menduyk on 4/1/2024. (Klink, David) *Modified event on 5/2/2024 (KJ). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Service by Kurt Koprucu . (Klink, David) |
Filing 6 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Ninell Menduyk. (Kleifield, Matthew) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Ninell Menduyk.(Kleifield, Matthew) |
Filing 4 PRELIMINARY ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on July 12, 2024, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/19/24. (SLQ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Ninell Menduyk. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22945232. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00840-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2024-006056. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22945232 filed by Ninell Menduyk. (submitted by Matthew Kleifield) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.