Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Yvonne Ramirez |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2024cv00881 |
| April 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief addressing why the Commissioner's decision is not supported by substantial evidence or why the decision should otherwise be reversed or the case remanded. Defendant must file an answering brief within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendant's brief. See Order for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/18/2024. (KJ)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KJ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's Application (Doc. #2 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to issue Notice re Social Security Case Service notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/18/2024. (KJ)
|
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00881-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Yvonne Ramirez. (submitted by Emily Tedone) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Yvonne Ramirez. (submitted by Emily Tedone) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yvonne Ramirez | |
| Represented By: | Emily Rose Tedone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
