Onsongo v. Garland et al
| Vane Moraa Onsongo |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, George Mihalko and John Ramirez |
| 2:2024cv00898 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, George Mihalko, John Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22966790. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00898-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Vane Moraa Onsongo. (submitted by Benjamin Wiesinger) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22966790 filed by Vane Moraa Onsongo. (submitted by Benjamin Wiesinger) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
