Ospina v. Mayorkas et al
| Mauricio Alejandro Bedoya Ospina |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and David Radel |
| 2:2024cv00951 |
| April 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(REK) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22986296. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Roslyn O Silver. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00951-PHX-ROS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Mauricio Alejandro Bedoya Ospina. (submitted by Maurice Goldman) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND MANDAMUS RELIEF. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22986296 filed by Mauricio Alejandro Bedoya Ospina. (submitted by Maurice Goldman) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
