Cantu v. PHH Mortgage Services
Plaintiff: Rogers Cantu
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Services
Case Number: 2:2024cv00974
Filed: April 30, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2024 Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - pursuant to the Court's Order filed 6/26/2024, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed. (KJ)
June 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. #6 ) is granted. The complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/25/2024. (KJ)
June 6, 2024 Filing 7 REQUEST re: for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Defendant PHH Mortgage Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Norman, Robert)
June 6, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by PHH Mortgage Services. (Norman, Robert)
June 5, 2024 Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Rogers Cantu: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint upon PHH Mortgage Services on 5/16/2024. (KJ)
June 5, 2024 Filing 5 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Rogers Cantu. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS)
May 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRELIMINARY ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on July 30, 2024, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/2/24. (SLQ)
May 1, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS)
April 30, 2024 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 200011802. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W. Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV24-00974-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS)
April 30, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number 200011802 filed by Rogers Cantu.(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cantu v. PHH Mortgage Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rogers Cantu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Services
Represented By: Robert Wayne Norman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?