Keim v. Mesa, City of et al
| Elsie Keim |
| Mesa, City of and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2024cv01182 |
| May 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Elsie Keim. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mesa, City of. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-23069942. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Stephen M McNamee. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-01182-PHX-SMM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Elsie Keim. (submitted by Kathryn Lunn) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-23069942 filed by Elsie Keim. (submitted by Kathryn Lunn) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
