Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Betty Phillips |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2024cv01592 |
| June 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Edmund Jack Darcher on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Darcher, Edmund) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Within 30 days after the answer and/or administrative record Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days after service of Defendant's brief. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/2/24. (DXD)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DXD) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/2/24. (DXD)
|
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Bryan Konoski on behalf of Plaintiff Betty Phillips. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-01592-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement on behalf of non-party Konoski & Partners PC. (submitted by Bryan Konoski) (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Betty Phillips. (submitted by Bryan Konoski) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Betty Phillips. (submitted by Bryan Konoski) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Betty Phillips | |
| Represented By: | Bryan Konoski |
| Represented By: | Bryan Konoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Edmund Jack Darcher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
