Patel v. Rokosky et al
| Hetalben Khodabhai Patel |
| Eric Rokosky, Markwayne Mullin, David J Venturella and Todd Blanche |
| 2:2026cv06607 |
| September 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Prisoner: Alien Detainee - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF IMMIGRATION HABEAS PETITION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS re: #5 Notice of General Order 26-09 and Standard Schedule, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) upon Melissa Kroeger, Lon Leavitt, Theo Nickerson, Dina Anagnopoulos, and Mary Finlon on this date. (MAR) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF GENERAL ORDER 26-09 AND STANDARD SCHEDULE - See documents for complete details. (Attachments: #1 GO 26-09, #2 AUSA Letter) (MAR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (Attachments: #1 Instructions) (MAR) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Hetalben Khodabhai Patel. (Singh, Dalbir) (MAR) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Hetalben Khodabhai Patel. (Singh, Dalbir) (MAR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number AAZDC-26127283 filed by Hetalben Khodabhai Patel. (Singh, Dalbir) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
