Kenton v. Foster, et al

Case Number: 3:2004cv02005
Filed: September 24, 2004
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
Presiding Judge: Unassigned - CIV
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 17, 2008 75 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the parties' proposed form of judgment 71 is construed as a stipulated judgment. That the plaintiff's Application for Attorneys' Fees 72 is deemed to be withdrawn. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 12/17/08.(DMT, )
October 23, 2008 70 Opinion or Order of the Court FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. That defendant Linda Foster shall specifically perform the real estate sales contract she entered into with plaintiff Scott Kenton on July 20, 2004, as that contract is set forth in the Escrow Instructions (T rial Exhibit That plaintiff Scott Kenton shall submit a proposed form of judgment no later than November 24, 2008. If counsel cannot reach an agreement regarding the proposed judgment after reasonable and sincere efforts to do so, defendant Linda Foster shall file her objection to the plaintiffs proposed judgment no later than December 5, 2008. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/22/08. (DMT, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kenton v. Foster, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?