O'Daniel v. Office of Navajo Hopi Indian Relocation

Plaintiff: Bobby O'Daniel
Defendant: Office of Navajo And Hopi Indian Relocation
Case Number: 3:2007cv00354
Filed: February 13, 2007
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Coconino
Presiding Judge: David K Duncan
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 25:640 Indian Tribal Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 18, 2008 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying Pla's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting Dft's 27 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Directing the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 09/15/08.(ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Daniel v. Office of Navajo Hopi Indian Relocation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of Navajo And Hopi Indian Relocation
Represented By: Patrick Joseph Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobby O'Daniel
Represented By: Betsy Lynn Snow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?