Saunders v. Yavapai County et al
| Carole Saunders |
| Yavapai County, R. Silva, Jane Doe Silva, Katherine Blaylock and John Doe Blaylock |
| 3:2007cv08029 |
| June 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Yavapai |
| Earl H Carroll |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
ORDER that each party file a memorandum addressing the issues in this order byNovember 10, 2010. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 10/18/10. (DMT)
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER - Having considered the Parties' 166 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time, IT IS ORDERED that parties have until Thursday, 9/23/2010 to file their Final Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 9/17/10. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 40 Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. ORDER that this action will proceed on Plaintiff's 42:1983 claim against Defendant Richard Silva for violating Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. All other claims and Defendants are dismissed. ORDER Defendant Richard Silva shall file an answer to Plaintiff's remaining claim within 20 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 11/5/09.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
