Madrid v. Concho Elementary School District No. 6 of Apache County et al
Manuel Madrid |
Concho Elementary School District No. 6 of Apache County, John Does I-V, Jane Does I-V and Black and White Corporations I-V |
3:2007cv08103 |
October 3, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Prescott Division Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER granting 87 Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Gallagher & Kennedy is awarded $1,716.19 in arbitrator's fees; defendants are awarded $34,194.55 in attorneys' fees to reimburse Arizona School Risk Retention Trust, Inc. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/30/2011.(NVO) |
Filing 85 ORDER denying without prejudice 77 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/26/2010.(NVO) |
Filing 75 ORDER granting 63 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 65 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/17/10.(DMT) |
Filing 54 ORDER denying Dfts' 51 Motion to confirm arbitration award. The Court will set a scheduling conference by separate order. The parties shall address the § 12-133 issues identified above in the joint filing made before the scheduling conference. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/28/09.(KMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.