Dunbar v. Arizona, State of et al
| Forrest Dunbar |
| Arizona, State of, Yavapai County, Yavapai County Attorney, Prescott, City of, Prescott Police Department, City of, John Does, Jane Does, Black and White Corporations, Black and White Partnerships and Black and White Proprietorships |
| 3:2008cv08024 |
| February 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Yuma |
| Mark E Aspey (PS) |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER that Pla's 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order re "Retrieval of Property Pending Trial" is denied. This case must remain closed. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 09/15/08. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 11 is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), and the Clerk must enter judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Prelimin ary Injunction and Motion for TRO; denying as moot 13 Plaintiff's Discovery Motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure to state a claim counts as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/10/08.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
