Kinlicheene v. United States of America

Plaintiff: Maybelle Kinlicheene
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2008cv08035
Filed: March 26, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office
County: Apache
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2671 Federal Tort Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 13, 2008 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss Case and to Vacate Status Hearing which is sufficient to automatically effectuate the dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 11/12/08.(DNH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kinlicheene v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maybelle Kinlicheene
Represented By: Alexander A Wold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?