Rose Contracting, LLC v. Whiteriver Construction, Inc.

Plaintiff: Rose Contracting, LLC
Defendant: Whiteriver Construction, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv08167
Filed: September 25, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Navajo
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 40:3131 Miller Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 5, 2012 39 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting parties' Joint 38 Motion to Dismiss. ORDERED DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE any and all claims with all parties to bear their respective costs and attorneys fees. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 6/4/2012. (LFIG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose Contracting, LLC v. Whiteriver Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rose Contracting, LLC
Represented By: Karen A Hunsaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whiteriver Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?