Bradley v. Ryan et al
3:2009cv08215 |
December 1, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Roslyn O Silver |
Edward C Voss (PS) |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER that the petitioner's [Motion for] Rule 8 Evidentiary Hearing 21 is denied. ORDER Accepting and Adopting Report and Recommendation 20 . ORDER that the petitioner's Petition Under 28:2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in S tate Custody is denied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. ORDER that no certificate of appealability shall issue and that the petitioner is not authorized to appeal in forma pauperis. ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 12/6/10. (TLJ) |
Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) that the Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice; IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward C Voss on 10/6/10. (TLJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bradley v. Ryan et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.