Beckman v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Plaintiff: Steven Dale Beckman
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Case Number: 3:2010cv08072
Filed: May 4, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Yavapai
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2011 Filing 24 ORDER that the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for calculation and award of benefits. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 08/23/11. (ESL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beckman v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Dale Beckman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?