Miles v. Ryan et al
| James Q Miles |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 3:2010cv08138 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Navajo |
| Lawrence O Anderson |
| G Murray Snow |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER ACCEPTING 12 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Anderson. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/22/11. (LSP)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER the Clerk shall serve a copy of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/15/10. (LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
