Palmer v. Savona et al
| Peter Michael Palmer |
| Unknown Savona, Glenn A Savona and Unknown Parties |
| 3:2010cv08209 |
| October 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER - Defendants having failed to comply with the Local Rules and having utterly failed to support their motion for attorney's fees, ORDERED denying 60 Defendants' Motion for Award of Attorney Fees and Non-Taxable Expenses. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/26/2014.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER: In Forma Pauperis status is revoked. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/15/2013. (ALS)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER - denying as moot 58 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay/Motion to Re-Open Case; ORDERED denying 59 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Clerk's Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/30/2013.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 48 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for Defendants accordingly. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/21/13. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
