Fleck v. American Home Mortgage Servicing Incorporated et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 9, 2012
ORDER - 1. Defendants' motion for attorneys' fees related to Plaintiff's motion to strike (Doc. 55) is granted in part as set forth above. Defendants are awarded attorneys' fees of $4,513.05 against Plaintiff's counsel Douglas C. Rhoads. 2. Defendants' second motion for attorneys fees (Doc. 59) is denied. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/9/12.(LAD)
|May 9, 2012
ORDER granting 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. By May 18, 2012, Defendants shall file a memorandum and supporting material setting forth the attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defending against this action. By May 25, 2012, Plaintiff shall file a response. By May 31, 2012, Defendants shall file a reply. The initial memoranda shall not exceed seven pages each (exclusive of attachments) and the reply shall not exceed four pages. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/9/12.(LAD)
|April 27, 2012
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Strike. Defendants shall file memorandum and supporting material setting forth attorneys' fees and costs incurred in responding to Plaintiff's motion on or before 5/4/2012; Plaintiff shall file a response on or before 5/11/2011; Defendants shall file a reply on or before 5/16/12. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/27/2012.(NVO)
|March 8, 2011
ORDER granting Quality Loan Service's 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying Plaintiff's 9 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/8/11.(REW)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?