Duncan v. Ryan et al
||William Westley Duncan
||Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
||April 29, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Prescott Division Office
||Jay R Irwin
||James A Teilborg
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 27, 2016
ORDER that the Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 82 ) is denied. ORDERED that the Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 83 ) is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 89 ) is rejected, modified, or accepted as spec ified in the PDF document; the objections of each party (Docs. 93 and 96 ) are sustained or overruled as specified above; the Petition is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. FINALLY ORDERED that the Motion for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 94 ) is denied. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/26/16. (EJA)
|March 8, 2013
ORDER that the 47 Report and Recommendation is accepted; the 32 Motion for Stay and Abeyance is granted. Petitioner and Respondents shall, within fourteen days of the conclusion of the state court proceedings, file with this Court a notice adv ising the Court of the status. Petitioner shall, on or before March 31, 2013, and before the expiration of each calendar quarter thereafter, until termination of the stay, file with this Court a notice advising the Court of the status of his state court proceedings. Petitioner's failure to timely file such notices will be grounds for dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/7/2013. (LFIG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?