Jones v. Mohave, County of et al
| James Luther Jones, Jr. |
| Mohave, County of and Carol Meier |
| 3:2011cv08093 |
| June 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Mohave |
| James A Teilborg |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 45 Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Judgment; denying 46 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions; denying 47 Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Judge. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 11/2/12.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 29 ) is granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions (Doc. 34 , Doc. 36 , Doc. 37 ) are denied as moot. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/22/2012.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 14 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. The Clerk shall dismiss this case with prejudice if Plaintiff fails to comply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 8 and 11 Motions for Summary Judgment for Writ of Execution and denying 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 1/11/12.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
