Montoya v. Ryan et al
| Leroy Montoya |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 3:2011cv08124 |
| August 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Edward C Voss (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER that the 30 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted, the 34 Objections are overruled, the Petition in this case is denied with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. ORDERED that in the event Pe titioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/25/2013. (LFIG)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER that Petitioner's motions for ruling on his petition 18 and 24 are denied. ORDER that Petitioner's motion to receive an electronic copy of his file 32 is denied. ORDER that Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file objections 31 is granted to the limited extent that Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation are due within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 1/30/13.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
