Western Watersheds Project et al v. United States Forest Service
| Western Watersheds Project and Center for Biological Diversity |
| United States Forest Service |
| 3:2011cv08128 |
| August 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Neil V Wake |
| Environmental Matters |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33 ), granting Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34 ), and granting Defendant-Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35 ) with respect to commerci al grazing on the following allotments: (1) Casner Park/Kelly Seep, (2) Pine Creek, (3) Seven C-Bar, (4) Twin Tanks, (5) Chino Valley, (6) Cosnino, and (7) V-Bar. FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33 ), deny ing Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34 ), and denying Defendant-Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35 ) with respect to commercial grazing on the Angell Allotment. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties confer an d submit by 01/08/13, a joint proposed form of judgment or, if the parties cannot agree, separate proposed forms of judgment and separate memoranda addressing the differences between the proposed forms of judgment. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 12/17/12. (NKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
